A- de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla
✓Claimant Jose Fredy Poveda Tejada Representante De La U.S.T.C. Y De Los Trabajadores De Telecom
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Produce efectos inter partes y sólo por excepción respecto de otros sujetos
- Derecho de toda persona para reclamar ante los jueces la protección de sus derechos fundamentales
- Reiteración de la improcedencia
- Procedencia sólo respecto de frases o conceptos de la parte resolutiva y a solicitud de parte
- Improcedencia por falta de legitimación por cuanto peticionario no es parte en el proceso
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-486 de 2006, dictada por la Sala Segunda de Revision el 29 de junio de 2006.
- Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al interesado.
- Tercero. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
- Comuniquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.